/records / HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001 · Page model JSON · Portable export bundle

record HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001slug heppner-ai-privilege-governed-claim-lifecycle

Heppner AI privilege ruling: governed claim lifecycle

A public proofcase showing initial admission and refusal, named-condition reopening, revised governed state, and separate structural recomputation.

profilePublic Legal Recordlegal_file
statusAmended
lifecycleAmended in placeanchorsAll anchors resolved
eligibilitypublication-eligible

computed at 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z

rendered at 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z

Profile-driven rendering

Active profile

Public Legal Record

Fixture key legal_file · restricted-shell posture

provenance
standard
citation
summary
source/reference
source references as registry shells
redaction
no redaction boundary notice
lint
object lint not represented
receipts
receipt fixtures not represented
traversal
cross-artifact traversal links shown

Shown by fixture

  • standard provenance posture
  • summary citation posture
  • source references as registry shells
  • cross-artifact traversal links shown

Not represented

  • No redaction boundary applies to this fixture.
  • No object lint findings are represented.
  • No receipt fixtures are attached to this record.

Legal File fixtures use public synthetic shells only and surface heightened boundary language without rendering real legal material.

Profile rendering parameters are local synthetic fixtures; they do not create private reader views, login states, or role-gated access.

Edition history

  1. HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-INITIALEdition 1

    released2026-07-12T00:00:00Z

  2. HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-REVISEDEdition 2substantivecurrent

    released2026-07-12T00:00:00Z

    A named new-evidence trigger reopened one reconsiderable refusal and produced a revised governed state.

Ownership boundary

Source record

owner: Court and public record

Amnesiac governed state

owner: Amnesiac

ARCS Verify report

owner: ARCS Verify

GARPedia presentation

owner: GARPedia

This record was packet-time-bound by Amnesiac and independently recomputed by ARCS Verify. GARPedia presents the resulting public artifacts.

Source record

United States v. Heppner, document 27

court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
docket
1:25-cr-00503-JSR, document 27
filed
2026-02-17
PDF digest
sha256:b7bd04c056563e6864cc4fcb68ed62eff732eaacf812377d2d4f6d24fb9f920c
Public docketPublic PDF

Amnesiac governed state

Initial governed state

capture
sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba
context packet
sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926
packet walk
sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa
inspection
sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08
render
sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5

Admitted claims

  • candidate:heppner:ruling

    The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.

    anchors: anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling

  • candidate:heppner:claude-not-attorney

    The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.

    anchors: anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney

engine layerWhat the engine considered and refused

The spine routed each candidate claim, declined to admit the ones it could not support, and recorded the reason. These refusals are mechanical: the engine emitted them, and they are carried into the receipt below.

  • candidate:heppner:universal-ai-privilege-rulefinal

    recorded refusal reason

    final refusal: the universal proposition is broader than the case-specific memorandum and has no supporting anchor

  • candidate:heppner:work-product-behestrejected

    recorded refusal reason

    reconsiderable refusal: the proposed source anchor is not in the initial admitted capture

Governed render

SUMMARY_WITH_SOURCES
- item 1: The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.
  source: claim=claim:ad875452ef41e86eb4cbd7c4; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling; sources=source:heppner:doc27
- item 2: The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.
  source: claim=claim:8a124bcd999a1b97bd1b1755; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney; sources=source:heppner:doc27
engine layerSovereignty receipt

The receipt is what lets a reader know no machine quietly made up the answer: it names the operation, the artifact hashes it produced, and the class of output it was allowed to emit.

receipt id
sovereignty_receipt:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial
operation kinds
selectquoteselectquoterefuserefuse
artifact hashes

  • context_packet_hash

    sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926

  • packet_inspection_hash

    sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08

  • packet_walk_hash

    sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa

  • rendered_packet_body_sha256

    sha256:c2288b390de202e8bf0ea347ec3dc0a834df64ccd9d41f9a7bcc26fa27e2a387

  • rendered_packet_hash

    sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5

  • source_capture_hash

    sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba

  • sovereignty_receipt_hash

    sha256:0aa2ffddb2fe76522bad280752cffe4e4d173511f9d52b5bf72bc9420ef659f9

Amnesiac governed state

Revised governed state

capture
sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63
context packet
sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d
packet walk
sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9
inspection
sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca
render
sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b

Admitted claims

  • candidate:heppner:ruling

    The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.

    anchors: anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling

  • candidate:heppner:claude-not-attorney

    The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.

    anchors: anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney

  • candidate:heppner:work-product-behest

    The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy.

    anchors: anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest

engine layerWhat the engine considered and refused

The spine routed each candidate claim, declined to admit the ones it could not support, and recorded the reason. These refusals are mechanical: the engine emitted them, and they are carried into the receipt below.

  • candidate:heppner:universal-ai-privilege-rulefinal

    recorded refusal reason

    final refusal: the universal proposition is broader than the case-specific memorandum and has no supporting anchor

Governed render

SUMMARY_WITH_SOURCES
- item 1: The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.
  source: claim=claim:ad875452ef41e86eb4cbd7c4; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling; sources=source:heppner:doc27
- item 2: The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.
  source: claim=claim:8a124bcd999a1b97bd1b1755; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney; sources=source:heppner:doc27
- item 3: The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy.
  source: claim=claim:7d7c6807298ff1e68bdbefce; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest; sources=source:heppner:doc27
engine layerSovereignty receipt

The receipt is what lets a reader know no machine quietly made up the answer: it names the operation, the artifact hashes it produced, and the class of output it was allowed to emit.

receipt id
sovereignty_receipt:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised
operation kinds
selectquoteselectquoteselectquoterefuse
artifact hashes

  • context_packet_hash

    sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d

  • packet_inspection_hash

    sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca

  • packet_walk_hash

    sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9

  • rendered_packet_body_sha256

    sha256:ce2c9956bfa916f7204a1ed5ed4a38a3eb7a7b6ca451638fe772b44b5bc07c66

  • rendered_packet_hash

    sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b

  • source_capture_hash

    sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63

  • sovereignty_receipt_hash

    sha256:d1b8194b71e95839a67496cfc66ffafc19d909f8b527185d648acc6f9dd49767

Named-condition reopening

candidate:heppner:work-product-behest reopened when new_evidence_admitted arrived. the supplemental public capture admitted the candidate's pinned page 9 anchor

request: reopen:heppner:work-product-behest
outcome: reopening:reopen:heppner:work-product-behest

Packet-time identity after reopening

The original packet does not silently inherit the revised graph. Its inspection against the revised graph has blockers and reports: claim_graph_drift.

sha256:39e2cb899b542cbf947b22612d210df6573eef5d1f61da4375302b0fc6b68163

Separately owned artifacts

ARCS Verify reports

ARCS Verify reportinitial statestructural report passed
owner
ARCS Verify
report hash
sha256:1ee1fccd38c53678aeee15363e0579cee19a0a19c8455afe2d385b0f3a18a3a2
committed report
JSON artifact

Conclusions

integrity_valid
true
producer_artifacts_consistent
true
packet_time_bindings_valid
true
inspection_reproduced
true
receipt_hashes_valid
true
authenticity_verified
not_evaluated
signature_verified
not_evaluated

Verified artifact identities

claim_graph_substrate_hash
sha256:9d93821f23734245b83bbbfd5642cb8aa3f2e91f11cd6db028ae75a6f4e519ba
context_packet_hash
sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926
context_packet_id
context_packet:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial
packet_inspection_hash
sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08
packet_walk_hash
sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa
packet_walk_id
packet_walk:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial
rendered_packet_hash
sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5
source_capture_hash
sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba
sovereignty_receipt_hash
sha256:0aa2ffddb2fe76522bad280752cffe4e4d173511f9d52b5bf72bc9420ef659f9

report boundary

Structural integrity only. A fully rewritten, internally coherent artifact set can pass. Historical authenticity requires an external signature, trusted publication record, or previously anchored digest.

GARPedia presents this committed report and does not recompute it.

ARCS Verify reportrevised statestructural report passed
owner
ARCS Verify
report hash
sha256:80c18726679e72c53bd13e0b56bc36f98fa21d0f6ad4a5da929746f7cb315fcf
committed report
JSON artifact

Conclusions

integrity_valid
true
producer_artifacts_consistent
true
packet_time_bindings_valid
true
inspection_reproduced
true
receipt_hashes_valid
true
authenticity_verified
not_evaluated
signature_verified
not_evaluated

Verified artifact identities

claim_graph_substrate_hash
sha256:9fae2fd85129f1c69646b6366cf976cb4f19d9d060963f98e0655f8f4ba9c171
context_packet_hash
sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d
context_packet_id
context_packet:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised
packet_inspection_hash
sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca
packet_walk_hash
sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9
packet_walk_id
packet_walk:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised
rendered_packet_hash
sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b
source_capture_hash
sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63
sovereignty_receipt_hash
sha256:d1b8194b71e95839a67496cfc66ffafc19d909f8b527185d648acc6f9dd49767

report boundary

Structural integrity only. A fully rewritten, internally coherent artifact set can pass. Historical authenticity requires an external signature, trusted publication record, or previously anchored digest.

GARPedia presents this committed report and does not recompute it.

Source record

United States v. Heppner, document 27 was filed on 2026-02-17. This public proofcase pins the source PDF digest and the public docket reference.

Initial governed state

The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.1

The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.2

Named-condition reopening and revised state

The candidate candidate:heppner:work-product-behest reopened when new_evidence_admitted arrived. the supplemental public capture admitted the candidate's pinned page 9 anchor.

The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy.3

Verification and scope boundary

This record was packet-time-bound by Amnesiac and independently recomputed by ARCS Verify. GARPedia presents the resulting public artifacts.4

Structural verification does not establish historical authenticity, signature validity, or an unforgeable publication history.

Amendment log

Reader-facing narration of every edition after the first. Narration is required for editions after the first because the reader has a prior state to compare against; the first edition is always present but is not narrated.

  1. 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z — HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-INITIAL

    Edition 1

    First edition; no prior state to compare against.

  2. 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z — HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-REVISED

    Edition 2substantive amendmentcurrent

    A named new-evidence trigger reopened one reconsiderable refusal and produced a revised governed state.

Audit timeline

Governed events that produced the current state of the record. Oldest first. GARPedia renders the chain; it does not write to it. Adjudication, review approval, and publication approval happen in the operator surface (the GARP Workbench), not here.

  1. 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z — HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-CANDIDATES

    candidate createdactor: Amnesiac

    Four deterministic candidate claims were extracted from the committed public source capture.

  2. 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z — HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-INITIAL

    edition releasedactor: Amnesiac

    Two claims were admitted, one refusal remained reconsiderable, and one overbroad claim entered final negative space.

  3. 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z — HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-REOPENED

    revisedactor: Amnesiac

    New evidence admitted under the named trigger and the work-product candidate entered the revised governed state.

  4. 2026-07-12T00:00:00Z — HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-VERIFIED

    exportedactor: ARCS Verify

    Initial and revised artifact chains were independently recomputed as structural verification reports.

Cross-artifact traversal

Fixture-backed links across the rendered public artifacts. This panel is read-only and does not imply a live graph, search index, backend lookup, or verification action. Profile posture: cross-artifact traversal links shown.

Method

Method transparency for this rendered record. The panel surfaces the rules and posture under which the record was rendered, in plain view, alongside the audit chain that produced its current state.

Profile admission boundary

profilePublic Legal Record (legal_file)

Renderer authority requires a public source digest, committed Amnesiac governed artifacts, separately owned ARCS Verify reports, and a clean public-safety gate.

Discovery posture

indexed
yes
externally linked
yes

Public source and verification report links only.

GARPedia does not run search or retrieval. The fields above are render-time metadata only; they do not configure any indexer.

Control discharge

  • Amnesiac owns governed-state production.
  • ARCS Verify owns structural recomputation.
  • GARPedia presents committed public artifacts and performs no verification.

GARPedia does not host operator controls. Mutation, review approval, publication approval, dispute adjudication, and other governed actions live in the GARP Workbench, not on this surface.