{
  "generated_by": "garpedia-page-model-exporter",
  "record": {
    "anchor_resolution_status": "all_resolved",
    "canonical_sections": [
      {
        "body": [
          {
            "text": "United States v. Heppner, document 27 was filed on 2026-02-17. This public proofcase pins the source PDF digest and the public docket reference."
          }
        ],
        "heading": "Source record",
        "section_id": "heppner-source-record"
      },
      {
        "body": [
          {
            "citation_span_ids": [
              "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling"
            ],
            "text": "The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine."
          },
          {
            "citation_span_ids": [
              "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney"
            ],
            "text": "The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim."
          }
        ],
        "heading": "Initial governed state",
        "section_id": "heppner-initial-state"
      },
      {
        "body": [
          {
            "text": "The candidate candidate:heppner:work-product-behest reopened when new_evidence_admitted arrived. the supplemental public capture admitted the candidate's pinned page 9 anchor."
          },
          {
            "citation_span_ids": [
              "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest"
            ],
            "text": "The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy."
          }
        ],
        "heading": "Named-condition reopening and revised state",
        "section_id": "heppner-revised-state"
      },
      {
        "body": [
          {
            "citation_span_ids": [
              "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p12:case-specific-conclusion"
            ],
            "text": "This record was packet-time-bound by Amnesiac and independently recomputed by ARCS Verify. GARPedia presents the resulting public artifacts."
          },
          {
            "text": "Structural verification does not establish historical authenticity, signature validity, or an unforgeable publication history."
          }
        ],
        "heading": "Verification and scope boundary",
        "section_id": "heppner-scope-boundary"
      }
    ],
    "citation_spans": [
      {
        "fragment_id": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling",
        "notes": "Public source page 1; initial capture anchor.",
        "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27",
        "span_id": "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling",
        "supports_section_id": "heppner-initial-state",
        "text": "the written exchanges were not protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine",
        "verification_state": "verbatim_verified"
      },
      {
        "fragment_id": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney",
        "notes": "Public source page 5; initial capture anchor.",
        "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27",
        "span_id": "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney",
        "supports_section_id": "heppner-initial-state",
        "text": "Because Claude is not an attorney, that alone disposes of Heppner's claim of privilege",
        "verification_state": "verbatim_verified"
      },
      {
        "fragment_id": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest",
        "notes": "Public source page 9; supplemental capture anchor.",
        "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27",
        "span_id": "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest",
        "supports_section_id": "heppner-revised-state",
        "text": "the documents were not prepared by or at the behest of counsel, nor did they reflect defense counsel's strategy",
        "verification_state": "verbatim_verified"
      },
      {
        "fragment_id": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p12:case-specific-conclusion",
        "notes": "Public source page 12; supplemental capture anchor.",
        "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27",
        "span_id": "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p12:case-specific-conclusion",
        "supports_section_id": "heppner-scope-boundary",
        "text": "Heppner's use of Claude fails to satisfy either of these rules",
        "verification_state": "verbatim_verified"
      }
    ],
    "claim_lifecycle": {
      "initial_state": {
        "admitted_claims": [
          {
            "anchor_refs": [
              "anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling"
            ],
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:ruling",
            "source_refs": [
              "source:heppner:doc27"
            ],
            "text": "The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine."
          },
          {
            "anchor_refs": [
              "anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney"
            ],
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:claude-not-attorney",
            "source_refs": [
              "source:heppner:doc27"
            ],
            "text": "The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim."
          }
        ],
        "capture_hash": "sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba",
        "context_packet_hash": "sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926",
        "inspection_hash": "sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08",
        "label": "Initial governed state",
        "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa",
        "receipt": {
          "artifact_hashes": {
            "context_packet_hash": "sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926",
            "packet_inspection_hash": "sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08",
            "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa",
            "rendered_packet_body_sha256": "sha256:c2288b390de202e8bf0ea347ec3dc0a834df64ccd9d41f9a7bcc26fa27e2a387",
            "rendered_packet_hash": "sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5",
            "source_capture_hash": "sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba",
            "sovereignty_receipt_hash": "sha256:0aa2ffddb2fe76522bad280752cffe4e4d173511f9d52b5bf72bc9420ef659f9"
          },
          "operation_kinds": [
            "select",
            "quote",
            "select",
            "quote",
            "refuse",
            "refuse"
          ],
          "receipt_id": "sovereignty_receipt:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial"
        },
        "refused_candidates": [
          {
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:universal-ai-privilege-rule",
            "lifecycle": "final",
            "reason": "final refusal: the universal proposition is broader than the case-specific memorandum and has no supporting anchor"
          },
          {
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:work-product-behest",
            "lifecycle": "rejected",
            "reason": "reconsiderable refusal: the proposed source anchor is not in the initial admitted capture",
            "reconsiderability_trigger": "new_evidence_admitted"
          }
        ],
        "render_hash": "sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5",
        "rendered_body": "SUMMARY_WITH_SOURCES\n- item 1: The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.\n  source: claim=claim:ad875452ef41e86eb4cbd7c4; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling; sources=source:heppner:doc27\n- item 2: The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.\n  source: claim=claim:8a124bcd999a1b97bd1b1755; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney; sources=source:heppner:doc27",
        "stage_id": "initial"
      },
      "limits": [
        "deterministic fixture extraction, not a semantic extraction benchmark",
        "public source digest pinned, remote source authenticity not independently attested",
        "local hash integrity only, no signature or trusted key identity",
        "not legal advice and not a claim about all AI-assisted legal work"
      ],
      "owners": {
        "governed_state": "Amnesiac",
        "presentation": "GARPedia",
        "source_record": "Court and public record",
        "verification_report": "ARCS Verify"
      },
      "proofcase_id": "heppner-public-proof.v0_1",
      "reopening": {
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:work-product-behest",
        "decision": "reopened",
        "outcome_ref": "reopening:reopen:heppner:work-product-behest",
        "rationale": "the supplemental public capture admitted the candidate's pinned page 9 anchor",
        "request_ref": "reopen:heppner:work-product-behest",
        "trigger": "new_evidence_admitted"
      },
      "required_caption": "This record was packet-time-bound by Amnesiac and independently recomputed by ARCS Verify. GARPedia presents the resulting public artifacts.",
      "revised_state": {
        "admitted_claims": [
          {
            "anchor_refs": [
              "anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling"
            ],
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:ruling",
            "source_refs": [
              "source:heppner:doc27"
            ],
            "text": "The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine."
          },
          {
            "anchor_refs": [
              "anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney"
            ],
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:claude-not-attorney",
            "source_refs": [
              "source:heppner:doc27"
            ],
            "text": "The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim."
          },
          {
            "anchor_refs": [
              "anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest"
            ],
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:work-product-behest",
            "source_refs": [
              "source:heppner:doc27"
            ],
            "text": "The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy."
          }
        ],
        "capture_hash": "sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63",
        "context_packet_hash": "sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d",
        "inspection_hash": "sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca",
        "label": "Revised governed state",
        "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9",
        "receipt": {
          "artifact_hashes": {
            "context_packet_hash": "sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d",
            "packet_inspection_hash": "sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca",
            "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9",
            "rendered_packet_body_sha256": "sha256:ce2c9956bfa916f7204a1ed5ed4a38a3eb7a7b6ca451638fe772b44b5bc07c66",
            "rendered_packet_hash": "sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b",
            "source_capture_hash": "sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63",
            "sovereignty_receipt_hash": "sha256:d1b8194b71e95839a67496cfc66ffafc19d909f8b527185d648acc6f9dd49767"
          },
          "operation_kinds": [
            "select",
            "quote",
            "select",
            "quote",
            "select",
            "quote",
            "refuse"
          ],
          "receipt_id": "sovereignty_receipt:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised"
        },
        "refused_candidates": [
          {
            "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:universal-ai-privilege-rule",
            "lifecycle": "final",
            "reason": "final refusal: the universal proposition is broader than the case-specific memorandum and has no supporting anchor"
          }
        ],
        "render_hash": "sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b",
        "rendered_body": "SUMMARY_WITH_SOURCES\n- item 1: The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.\n  source: claim=claim:ad875452ef41e86eb4cbd7c4; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling; sources=source:heppner:doc27\n- item 2: The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.\n  source: claim=claim:8a124bcd999a1b97bd1b1755; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney; sources=source:heppner:doc27\n- item 3: The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy.\n  source: claim=claim:7d7c6807298ff1e68bdbefce; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest; sources=source:heppner:doc27",
        "stage_id": "revised"
      },
      "source_record": {
        "capture_hash": "sha256:b7bd04c056563e6864cc4fcb68ed62eff732eaacf812377d2d4f6d24fb9f920c",
        "court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
        "docket_number": "1:25-cr-00503-JSR",
        "docket_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71872024/united-states-v-heppner/",
        "document_number": 27,
        "filed_date": "2026-02-17",
        "label": "United States v. Heppner, document 27",
        "pdf_url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.652138/gov.uscourts.nysd.652138.27.0.pdf",
        "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27"
      },
      "stale_initial_inspection": {
        "has_blockers": true,
        "inspection_hash": "sha256:39e2cb899b542cbf947b22612d210df6573eef5d1f61da4375302b0fc6b68163",
        "issue_codes": [
          "claim_graph_drift"
        ]
      }
    },
    "control_discharge": {
      "notes": [
        "Amnesiac owns governed-state production.",
        "ARCS Verify owns structural recomputation.",
        "GARPedia presents committed public artifacts and performs no verification."
      ]
    },
    "corpus_lifecycle": "amended_in_place",
    "cross_references": [],
    "current_edition": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-REVISED",
    "discovery_posture": {
      "externally_linked": true,
      "notes": "Public source and verification report links only.",
      "search_indexed": true
    },
    "disputes": [],
    "editions": [
      {
        "edition_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-INITIAL",
        "edition_number": 1,
        "released_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z"
      },
      {
        "amendment_kind": "substantive",
        "amendment_summary": "A named new-evidence trigger reopened one reconsiderable refusal and produced a revised governed state.",
        "edition_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EDITION-REVISED",
        "edition_number": 2,
        "produced_by_event_ids": [
          "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-REOPENED"
        ],
        "released_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z"
      }
    ],
    "entities": [],
    "exports": [],
    "intersections": [],
    "lineage": [
      {
        "actor_role": "Amnesiac",
        "detail": "Four deterministic candidate claims were extracted from the committed public source capture.",
        "event_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-CANDIDATES",
        "event_type": "candidate_created",
        "occurred_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z"
      },
      {
        "actor_role": "Amnesiac",
        "detail": "Two claims were admitted, one refusal remained reconsiderable, and one overbroad claim entered final negative space.",
        "event_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-INITIAL",
        "event_type": "edition_released",
        "occurred_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z"
      },
      {
        "actor_role": "Amnesiac",
        "detail": "New evidence admitted under the named trigger and the work-product candidate entered the revised governed state.",
        "event_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-REOPENED",
        "event_type": "revised",
        "occurred_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z"
      },
      {
        "actor_role": "ARCS Verify",
        "detail": "Initial and revised artifact chains were independently recomputed as structural verification reports.",
        "event_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-EVENT-VERIFIED",
        "event_type": "exported",
        "occurred_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z"
      }
    ],
    "page_id": "GARPEDIA-PAGE-HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001",
    "profile": {
      "admission_boundary": "Renderer authority requires a public source digest, committed Amnesiac governed artifacts, separately owned ARCS Verify reports, and a clean public-safety gate.",
      "id": "legal_file",
      "label": "Public Legal Record"
    },
    "projections": [
      {
        "compression_kind": "summary",
        "compression_ratio": 0.5,
        "generated_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z",
        "known_loss_categories": [
          "deterministic fixture extraction, not a semantic extraction benchmark",
          "public source digest pinned, remote source authenticity not independently attested",
          "local hash integrity only, no signature or trusted key identity",
          "not legal advice and not a claim about all AI-assisted legal work"
        ],
        "notes": "Initial Amnesiac governed state projected for public reading.",
        "projection_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-PROJECTION-INITIAL",
        "reversible_to_record": false
      },
      {
        "compression_kind": "summary",
        "compression_ratio": 0.6,
        "generated_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z",
        "known_loss_categories": [
          "deterministic fixture extraction, not a semantic extraction benchmark",
          "public source digest pinned, remote source authenticity not independently attested",
          "local hash integrity only, no signature or trusted key identity",
          "not legal advice and not a claim about all AI-assisted legal work"
        ],
        "notes": "Revised Amnesiac governed state projected for public reading.",
        "projection_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-PROJECTION-REVISED",
        "reversible_to_record": false
      }
    ],
    "provenance": {
      "source_kind": "public_court_record_with_external_verification"
    },
    "record_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001",
    "redaction": {
      "applies": false
    },
    "rendered_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z",
    "route_slug": "/records/HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001",
    "slug": "heppner-ai-privilege-governed-claim-lifecycle",
    "sources": [
      {
        "capture_hash": "sha256:b7bd04c056563e6864cc4fcb68ed62eff732eaacf812377d2d4f6d24fb9f920c",
        "description": "Public memorandum used as the sole source for this proofcase.",
        "label": "United States v. Heppner, document 27",
        "publication_status": "public",
        "slug": "united-states-v-heppner-document-27",
        "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27",
        "source_type": "filing",
        "span_ids": [
          "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling",
          "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney",
          "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest",
          "span:anchor:heppner:doc27:p12:case-specific-conclusion"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "status": "amended",
    "subtitle": "A public proofcase showing initial admission and refusal, named-condition reopening, revised governed state, and separate structural recomputation.",
    "title": "Heppner AI privilege ruling: governed claim lifecycle",
    "verification_reports": [
      {
        "boundary_note": "Structural integrity only. A fully rewritten, internally coherent artifact set can pass. Historical authenticity requires an external signature, trusted publication record, or previously anchored digest.",
        "conclusions": {
          "authenticity_verified": "not_evaluated",
          "inspection_reproduced": "true",
          "integrity_valid": "true",
          "packet_time_bindings_valid": "true",
          "producer_artifacts_consistent": "true",
          "receipt_hashes_valid": "true",
          "signature_verified": "not_evaluated"
        },
        "findings": [],
        "owner": "ARCS Verify",
        "passed": true,
        "public_path": "/garpedia/verification-reports/HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001-initial.report.json",
        "report_hash": "sha256:1ee1fccd38c53678aeee15363e0579cee19a0a19c8455afe2d385b0f3a18a3a2",
        "schema": "arcs_verify.report.v0_1_1",
        "stage": "initial",
        "verification_profile": "full_artifact_chain.v0_1",
        "verified_artifacts": {
          "claim_graph_substrate_hash": "sha256:9d93821f23734245b83bbbfd5642cb8aa3f2e91f11cd6db028ae75a6f4e519ba",
          "context_packet_hash": "sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926",
          "context_packet_id": "context_packet:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial",
          "packet_inspection_hash": "sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08",
          "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa",
          "packet_walk_id": "packet_walk:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial",
          "rendered_packet_hash": "sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5",
          "source_capture_hash": "sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba",
          "sovereignty_receipt_hash": "sha256:0aa2ffddb2fe76522bad280752cffe4e4d173511f9d52b5bf72bc9420ef659f9"
        }
      },
      {
        "boundary_note": "Structural integrity only. A fully rewritten, internally coherent artifact set can pass. Historical authenticity requires an external signature, trusted publication record, or previously anchored digest.",
        "conclusions": {
          "authenticity_verified": "not_evaluated",
          "inspection_reproduced": "true",
          "integrity_valid": "true",
          "packet_time_bindings_valid": "true",
          "producer_artifacts_consistent": "true",
          "receipt_hashes_valid": "true",
          "signature_verified": "not_evaluated"
        },
        "findings": [],
        "owner": "ARCS Verify",
        "passed": true,
        "public_path": "/garpedia/verification-reports/HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001-revised.report.json",
        "report_hash": "sha256:80c18726679e72c53bd13e0b56bc36f98fa21d0f6ad4a5da929746f7cb315fcf",
        "schema": "arcs_verify.report.v0_1_1",
        "stage": "revised",
        "verification_profile": "full_artifact_chain.v0_1",
        "verified_artifacts": {
          "claim_graph_substrate_hash": "sha256:9fae2fd85129f1c69646b6366cf976cb4f19d9d060963f98e0655f8f4ba9c171",
          "context_packet_hash": "sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d",
          "context_packet_id": "context_packet:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised",
          "packet_inspection_hash": "sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca",
          "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9",
          "packet_walk_id": "packet_walk:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised",
          "rendered_packet_hash": "sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b",
          "source_capture_hash": "sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63",
          "sovereignty_receipt_hash": "sha256:d1b8194b71e95839a67496cfc66ffafc19d909f8b527185d648acc6f9dd49767"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "schema_family": "garpedia.rendered_record",
  "schema_version": 1
}