PERSONAL CANON PC02 WEB RESEARCH NOTES
Research date: 2026-08-09
Presentation-only rendering. Counterpedia preserves this document’s source Markdown bytes exactly and formats them for reading here. This does not admit the document, verify its claims, or convert it into a governed Counterpedia entry.
Research date: 2026-08-09
Primary sources consulted
Attention Is All You Need — arXiv
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
Observed:
initial submission June 12, 2017;
multiple later arXiv versions through 2023;
current abstract reports 28.4 BLEU En-De, 41.8 BLEU En-Fr;
architecture removes recurrence/convolution from sequence layers;
paper's Table 1: full self-attention O(n^2 d) complexity, O(1) sequential ops, O(1) max path length;
recurrent layer: O(n d^2), O(n) sequential ops, O(n) path length;
paper explicitly says self-attention faster than recurrence when n < d in the stated comparison regime;
paper notes long-sequence computational performance as a problem and suggests restricted attention;
parsing experiment extends beyond translation.
NeurIPS proceedings / reviews
https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Reviews.html
Observed:
official proceedings abstract available;
official review record includes one reviewer reporting substantial reimplementation work;
review flags hyperparameter extraction, learning-rate schedule sensitivity and inference differences;
another review asks for direct long-sentence validation and significance tests.
FlashAttention
https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14135
Observed:
later systems paper characterizes Transformers as slow/memory-hungry on long sequences because of quadratic self-attention;
introduces IO-aware exact attention;
argues hardware-memory reads/writes are a missing performance dimension;
shows wall-clock gains while preserving exact attention semantics.
Design conclusion
PC-02 should separate:
original paper claim
author motivation
contemporaneous reviewer concern
later public evidence
private researcher experiment
current researcher beliefThe demo should never silently promote later field history into the original paper's evidence.