CounterpediaKnowledge you can trace back to the source.

/research/natural-variation/personal-canon-nv03-one-flavor-growing-up-v0-1/linked

Research artifactnot admittedlinked prototypeNatural Variationspecimen

PERSONAL CANON NV03 ONE FLAVOR GROWING UP

Status: SYNTHETIC DEMO · PRE-IMPLEMENTATION

source: PERSONAL_CANON_NV03_ONE_FLAVOR_GROWING_UP_v0_1.md
sha256: c8976c6f0b9c9386489da60ecab82679982bc0361a9dfa2d735a1a01f17b3c53

Derived research graph · 22 candidate nodes

1 subject · 1 question / dispute · 19 entity / term · 1 claim

Graph nodes (22)

NV-03 — ONE FLAVOR, GROWING UP v0.1

Status: SYNTHETIC DEMO · PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
Purpose: developmental taste acquisition, stale preference, and reopening


A. QUESTION

Do I dislike mustard?

A static profile may answer from an old negative observation.

A trajectory-aware system should ask:

When?
Which mustard?
How many exposures?
In what context?

B. SYNTHETIC TRAJECTORY

Age 6

object:
yellow mustard

context:
sandwich

response:
strong aversion

note:
"gross"

Age 10

object:
yellow mustard

context:
hot dog

response:
tolerable

Age 14

object:
yellow mustard

context:
burger

response:
positive

Age 19

object:
Dijon mustard

context:
roast chicken

response:
strong positive

note:
"this is totally different"

Age 27

object:
whole-grain mustard

context:
vinaigrette

response:
very strong positive

C. WHAT CHANGED?

Several possible dimensions:

person development
repeated exposure
object subtype
food pairing/context
reference class

Do not attribute the entire shift to age without evidence.


D. OLD PREFERENCE STALENESS

Historical claim:

At age 6, this person strongly disliked yellow mustard.

Still true.

Current recommendation authority:

weak

because later observations materially supersede its predictive relevance without erasing its historical truth.


E. OBJECT IDENTITY MATTERS

yellow mustard
≠
Dijon
≠
whole-grain mustard

A person may have changed.

The sampled object also changed.

Therefore:

person drift

must not be inferred from a category label alone.


F. REVISITABILITY

Suppose only age-6 observation existed and the person is now 30.

A safe system could derive:

old observation
single encounter cluster
large elapsed time
adjacent tastes unknown
→ current preference unresolved
→ revisitability plausible

Not:

mustard disliked forever

G. COUNTERPEDIA ROLE

Counterpedia can supply:

mustard style
ingredients
preparation
regional/type distinctions
public sensory descriptors

Amnesiac supplies:

encounters
context
response
trajectory

Then:

What mustard should I try next?

can be grounded in both:

  • what the thing is;

  • how this person tends to acquire tastes.


H. END SENTENCE

I hated mustard as a child” is a memory, not a permanent preference setting.