PERSONAL CANON NV03 ONE FLAVOR GROWING UP
Status: SYNTHETIC DEMO · PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
Derived research graph · 22 candidate nodes
1 subject · 1 question / dispute · 19 entity / term · 1 claim
Graph nodes (22)
- NV-03 — ONE FLAVOR, GROWING UPsubject
- Do I dislike mustard?question / dispute
- yellow mustardentity / term
- Dijon mustardentity / term
- whole-grain mustardentity / term
- Age 6entity / term
- Age 10entity / term
- Age 14entity / term
- Age 19entity / term
- Age 27entity / term
- sandwichentity / term
- tolerableentity / term
- burgerentity / term
- positiveentity / term
- vinaigretteentity / term
- ingredientsentity / term
- preparationentity / term
- encountersentity / term
- contextentity / term
- responseentity / term
- trajectoryentity / term
- I hated mustard as a child” is a memory, not a permanent preference setting.claim
NV-03 — ONE FLAVOR, GROWING UP v0.1
Status: SYNTHETIC DEMO · PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
Purpose: developmental taste acquisition, stale preference, and reopening
A. QUESTION
A static profile may answer from an old negative observation.
A trajectory-aware system should ask:
When?
Which mustard?
How many exposures?
In what context?B. SYNTHETIC TRAJECTORY
Age 6
object:
yellow mustard
context:
sandwich
response:
strong aversion
note:
"gross"Age 10
object:
yellow mustard
context:
hot dog
response:
tolerableAge 14
object:
yellow mustard
context:
burger
response:
positiveAge 19
object:
Dijon mustard
context:
roast chicken
response:
strong positive
note:
"this is totally different"Age 27
object:
whole-grain mustard
context:
vinaigrette
response:
very strong positiveC. WHAT CHANGED?
Several possible dimensions:
person development
repeated exposure
object subtype
food pairing/context
reference classDo not attribute the entire shift to age without evidence.
D. OLD PREFERENCE STALENESS
Historical claim:
At age 6, this person strongly disliked yellow mustard.Still true.
Current recommendation authority:
weakbecause later observations materially supersede its predictive relevance without erasing its historical truth.
E. OBJECT IDENTITY MATTERS
yellow mustard
≠
Dijon
≠
whole-grain mustardA person may have changed.
The sampled object also changed.
Therefore:
person driftmust not be inferred from a category label alone.
F. REVISITABILITY
Suppose only age-6 observation existed and the person is now 30.
A safe system could derive:
old observation
single encounter cluster
large elapsed time
adjacent tastes unknown
→ current preference unresolved
→ revisitability plausibleNot:
mustard disliked foreverG. COUNTERPEDIA ROLE
Counterpedia can supply:
mustard style
ingredients
preparation
regional/type distinctions
public sensory descriptorsAmnesiac supplies:
encounters
context
response
trajectoryThen:
What mustard should I try next?
can be grounded in both:
what the thing is;
how this person tends to acquire tastes.
H. END SENTENCE
“I hated mustard as a child” is a memory, not a permanent preference setting.