PERSONAL CANON NV01 ONE SONG TEN HEARINGS
Status: SYNTHETIC DEMO · PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
Presentation-only rendering. Counterpedia preserves this document’s source Markdown bytes exactly and formats them for reading here. This does not admit the document, verify its claims, or convert it into a governed Counterpedia entry.
NV-01 — ONE SONG, TEN HEARINGS v0.1
Status: SYNTHETIC DEMO · PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
Purpose: show exposure-driven, non-monotonic preference without factual correction
A. QUESTION
Do I like this song?
The system should refuse the implication that there must be one timeless Boolean.
Use a synthetic musical work:
WORK:
"Northbound Lights"No copyrighted audio is required for the proving fixture.
B. TEN ENCOUNTERS
#1
context: headphones, distracted
response:
enjoyment 0.30
familiarity 0.05
note:
"don't get it"
#2
context: playlist
response:
enjoyment 0.35
note:
"chorus still annoys me"
#3
context: accidental replay
response:
enjoyment 0.48
note:
"chorus is stuck in my head"
#4
context: walking at night
response:
enjoyment 0.66
context_fit 0.80
note:
"actually pretty good here"
#5
context: focused listen
response:
enjoyment 0.82
craft_admiration 0.77
note:
"love the bridge"
#6
context: frequent replay
response:
enjoyment 0.91
note:
"favorite song this month"
#7
context: heavy recent exposure
response:
enjoyment 0.63
saturation 0.75
note:
"overplayed"
#8
context: playlist
response:
enjoyment 0.28
saturation 0.92
behavior:
skip
#9
context: 18 months later, unexpected encounter
response:
enjoyment 0.79
nostalgia 0.88
note:
"wow"
#10
context: summer-night drive
response:
enjoyment 0.87
nostalgia 0.93
context_fit 0.95
note:
"this takes me straight back"C. TRAJECTORY
dislike
→ familiarity
→ appreciation
→ love
→ saturation
→ avoidance
→ dormancy
→ nostalgia
→ affectionate returnThis is not a contradiction sequence.
It is the relation history.
D. WHAT STATIC PERSONALIZATION GETS WRONG
After encounter #1:
user dislikes songAfter #8:
user dislikes songBoth lose the meaningful trajectory.
Better:
first-listen negative
slow acquisition
high peak
saturation
long dormancy
nostalgic returnE. REVISITABILITY
At #8 the current response is strongly negative.
Should the agent permanently suppress the work?
No automatic inference.
Possible reopening evidence:
negative response follows heavy saturation
historical peak was high
long gap may alter responseDerived candidate:
revisitability = plausible_after_dormancyNot:
force replayF. PERSONAL CONCEPTS
After many works, Amnesiac may discover:
slow_burn_music
overplay_sensitive
night_drive_context
nostalgia_returnOnly if supported by repeated trajectories.
G. FLAGSHIP UI
"Northbound Lights"
1 dislike
2 dislike
3 curiosity
4 like
5 love
6 peak
7 saturation
8 avoidance
[18 months]
9 nostalgia
10 affectionate returnClick any point:
Why was I here?
Show:
encounter count;
context;
recent exposure;
dimensional response;
note;
associated memory, if private/allowed.
H. END SENTENCE
You did not finally decide whether you like the song. You developed a history with it.