{
  "initial_state": {
    "admitted_claims": [
      {
        "anchor_refs": [
          "anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling"
        ],
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:ruling",
        "source_refs": [
          "source:heppner:doc27"
        ],
        "text": "The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine."
      },
      {
        "anchor_refs": [
          "anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney"
        ],
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:claude-not-attorney",
        "source_refs": [
          "source:heppner:doc27"
        ],
        "text": "The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim."
      }
    ],
    "capture_hash": "sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba",
    "capture_integrity": {
      "capture_referent": {
        "referent_id": "thelaplage/arcs-amnesiac@1dc7660:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial_state",
        "referent_kind": "upstream_pipeline_artifact",
        "referent_note": "Governed-state capture produced by the Amnesiac pipeline at the pinned upstream commit. GARPedia transcribes the digest and does not recompute it."
      },
      "integrity_class": "captured_bytes"
    },
    "context_packet_hash": "sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926",
    "inspection_hash": "sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08",
    "label": "Initial governed state",
    "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa",
    "receipt": {
      "artifact_hashes": {
        "context_packet_hash": "sha256:06690ebb470ce9e55636030da00669d99620a170ad72b64800f3d88c1066a926",
        "packet_inspection_hash": "sha256:1dece7529bdd71df2e0833ad246fab26e630439d760c1883b7a7e507cde6ce08",
        "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:6a80eafa461b57a40d43dcbcadca557958b090553de99ecbaad43305e8707bfa",
        "rendered_packet_body_sha256": "sha256:c2288b390de202e8bf0ea347ec3dc0a834df64ccd9d41f9a7bcc26fa27e2a387",
        "rendered_packet_hash": "sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5",
        "source_capture_hash": "sha256:3181417aafdd03e33712b3be7f2b26311914e4f2906010f77e3aa17c798c9fba",
        "sovereignty_receipt_hash": "sha256:0aa2ffddb2fe76522bad280752cffe4e4d173511f9d52b5bf72bc9420ef659f9"
      },
      "operation_kinds": [
        "select",
        "quote",
        "select",
        "quote",
        "refuse",
        "refuse"
      ],
      "receipt_id": "sovereignty_receipt:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:initial"
    },
    "refused_candidates": [
      {
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:universal-ai-privilege-rule",
        "lifecycle": "final",
        "reason": "final refusal: the universal proposition is broader than the case-specific memorandum and has no supporting anchor"
      },
      {
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:work-product-behest",
        "lifecycle": "rejected",
        "reason": "reconsiderable refusal: the proposed source anchor is not in the initial admitted capture",
        "reconsiderability_trigger": "new_evidence_admitted"
      }
    ],
    "render_hash": "sha256:3d115e3030a38f4a73e15df381412349d124ca9fb81089379e40ef39a205abd5",
    "rendered_body": "SUMMARY_WITH_SOURCES\n- item 1: The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.\n  source: claim=claim:ad875452ef41e86eb4cbd7c4; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling; sources=source:heppner:doc27\n- item 2: The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.\n  source: claim=claim:8a124bcd999a1b97bd1b1755; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney; sources=source:heppner:doc27",
    "stage_id": "initial"
  },
  "limits": [
    "deterministic fixture extraction, not a semantic extraction benchmark",
    "public source digest pinned, remote source authenticity not independently attested",
    "local hash integrity only, no signature or trusted key identity",
    "not legal advice and not a claim about all AI-assisted legal work"
  ],
  "profile": {
    "admission_boundary": "Renderer authority requires a public source digest, committed Amnesiac governed artifacts, separately owned ARCS Verify reports, and a clean public-safety gate.",
    "id": "legal_file",
    "label": "Public Legal Record"
  },
  "record_id": "HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001",
  "rendered_at": "2026-07-12T00:00:00Z",
  "reopening": {
    "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:work-product-behest",
    "decision": "reopened",
    "outcome_ref": "reopening:reopen:heppner:work-product-behest",
    "rationale": "the supplemental public capture admitted the candidate's pinned page 9 anchor",
    "request_ref": "reopen:heppner:work-product-behest",
    "trigger": "new_evidence_admitted"
  },
  "required_caption": "This record was packet-time-bound by Amnesiac and independently recomputed by ARCS Verify. GARPedia presents the resulting public artifacts.",
  "revised_state": {
    "admitted_claims": [
      {
        "anchor_refs": [
          "anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling"
        ],
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:ruling",
        "source_refs": [
          "source:heppner:doc27"
        ],
        "text": "The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine."
      },
      {
        "anchor_refs": [
          "anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney"
        ],
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:claude-not-attorney",
        "source_refs": [
          "source:heppner:doc27"
        ],
        "text": "The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim."
      },
      {
        "anchor_refs": [
          "anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest"
        ],
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:work-product-behest",
        "source_refs": [
          "source:heppner:doc27"
        ],
        "text": "The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy."
      }
    ],
    "capture_hash": "sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63",
    "capture_integrity": {
      "capture_referent": {
        "referent_id": "thelaplage/arcs-amnesiac@1dc7660:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised_state",
        "referent_kind": "upstream_pipeline_artifact",
        "referent_note": "Governed-state capture produced by the Amnesiac pipeline at the pinned upstream commit. GARPedia transcribes the digest and does not recompute it."
      },
      "integrity_class": "captured_bytes"
    },
    "context_packet_hash": "sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d",
    "inspection_hash": "sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca",
    "label": "Revised governed state",
    "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9",
    "receipt": {
      "artifact_hashes": {
        "context_packet_hash": "sha256:3b886764a7b07a509197ff37708e9aa39ff7f119ecd9e4bad833bdc5b314b37d",
        "packet_inspection_hash": "sha256:344bfbb383b51f0d95e8e0a386e513bed4d194b002a0af0a3157821b79a049ca",
        "packet_walk_hash": "sha256:94d3ec5c82661b27dfb749fe77e0e7646d5ca6189c029089e61698b091a7f4a9",
        "rendered_packet_body_sha256": "sha256:ce2c9956bfa916f7204a1ed5ed4a38a3eb7a7b6ca451638fe772b44b5bc07c66",
        "rendered_packet_hash": "sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b",
        "source_capture_hash": "sha256:5fea7192b2dd8399bb121e43772f50e472de801a751415ea6080161c2eee8c63",
        "sovereignty_receipt_hash": "sha256:d1b8194b71e95839a67496cfc66ffafc19d909f8b527185d648acc6f9dd49767"
      },
      "operation_kinds": [
        "select",
        "quote",
        "select",
        "quote",
        "select",
        "quote",
        "refuse"
      ],
      "receipt_id": "sovereignty_receipt:heppner-public-proof.v0_1:revised"
    },
    "refused_candidates": [
      {
        "candidate_ref": "candidate:heppner:universal-ai-privilege-rule",
        "lifecycle": "final",
        "reason": "final refusal: the universal proposition is broader than the case-specific memorandum and has no supporting anchor"
      }
    ],
    "render_hash": "sha256:af5265465c37cafb0cce63c82d0630d5f024271069b44b1cbed2c7e0419cf93b",
    "rendered_body": "SUMMARY_WITH_SOURCES\n- item 1: The court ruled that Heppner's AI Documents were protected by neither attorney-client privilege nor the work product doctrine.\n  source: claim=claim:ad875452ef41e86eb4cbd7c4; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling; sources=source:heppner:doc27\n- item 2: The court concluded that Claude was not an attorney and treated that fact as sufficient to defeat Heppner's attorney-client privilege claim.\n  source: claim=claim:8a124bcd999a1b97bd1b1755; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney; sources=source:heppner:doc27\n- item 3: The work-product ruling rested in part on the AI Documents not being prepared by or at the behest of counsel and not reflecting counsel's strategy.\n  source: claim=claim:7d7c6807298ff1e68bdbefce; anchors=anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest; sources=source:heppner:doc27",
    "stage_id": "revised"
  },
  "schema": "garpedia.heppner_lifecycle_record.v0_1",
  "slug": "heppner-ai-privilege-governed-claim-lifecycle",
  "source": {
    "anchors": [
      {
        "anchor_ref": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p1:ruling",
        "fragment": "the written exchanges were not protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine",
        "page": 1,
        "stage": "initial"
      },
      {
        "anchor_ref": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p5:claude-not-attorney",
        "fragment": "Because Claude is not an attorney, that alone disposes of Heppner's claim of privilege",
        "page": 5,
        "stage": "initial"
      },
      {
        "anchor_ref": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p9:work-product-behest",
        "fragment": "the documents were not prepared by or at the behest of counsel, nor did they reflect defense counsel's strategy",
        "page": 9,
        "stage": "supplemental"
      },
      {
        "anchor_ref": "anchor:heppner:doc27:p12:case-specific-conclusion",
        "fragment": "Heppner's use of Claude fails to satisfy either of these rules",
        "page": 12,
        "stage": "supplemental"
      }
    ],
    "capture_hash": "sha256:b7bd04c056563e6864cc4fcb68ed62eff732eaacf812377d2d4f6d24fb9f920c",
    "capture_integrity": {
      "capture_referent": {
        "referent_id": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.652138/gov.uscourts.nysd.652138.27.0.pdf",
        "referent_kind": "external_document",
        "referent_note": "United States v. Heppner, document 27 (S.D.N.Y., filed 2026-02-17). Public source digest pinned; remote source authenticity not independently attested."
      },
      "integrity_class": "captured_bytes"
    },
    "court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
    "description": "Public memorandum used as the sole source for this proofcase.",
    "docket_number": "1:25-cr-00503-JSR",
    "docket_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71872024/united-states-v-heppner/",
    "document_number": 27,
    "filed_date": "2026-02-17",
    "label": "United States v. Heppner, document 27",
    "pdf_url": "https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.652138/gov.uscourts.nysd.652138.27.0.pdf",
    "publication_status": "public",
    "slug": "united-states-v-heppner-document-27",
    "source_id": "PUBLIC-SRC-HEPPNER-DOC27",
    "source_type": "filing"
  },
  "source_kind": "public_court_record_with_external_verification",
  "stale_initial_inspection": {
    "has_blockers": true,
    "inspection_hash": "sha256:39e2cb899b542cbf947b22612d210df6573eef5d1f61da4375302b0fc6b68163",
    "issue_codes": [
      "claim_graph_drift"
    ]
  },
  "subtitle": "A public proofcase showing initial admission and refusal, named-condition reopening, revised governed state, and separate structural recomputation.",
  "title": "Heppner AI privilege ruling: governed claim lifecycle",
  "upstream": {
    "amnesiac_commit": "1dc7660",
    "amnesiac_repository": "thelaplage/arcs-amnesiac",
    "arcs_verify_commit": "d1379cf",
    "arcs_verify_repository": "thelaplage/arcs-verify",
    "proofcase_id": "heppner-public-proof.v0_1"
  },
  "verification_report_refs": [
    {
      "public_path": "/garpedia/verification-reports/HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001-initial.report.json",
      "report_hash": "sha256:1ee1fccd38c53678aeee15363e0579cee19a0a19c8455afe2d385b0f3a18a3a2",
      "stage": "initial"
    },
    {
      "public_path": "/garpedia/verification-reports/HEPPNER-LIFECYCLE-0001-revised.report.json",
      "report_hash": "sha256:80c18726679e72c53bd13e0b56bc36f98fa21d0f6ad4a5da929746f7cb315fcf",
      "stage": "revised"
    }
  ]
}